An Overview of the Flexible Fiscal Option
Differences between the FFO concept and the application in the model


An Overview of the Flexible Fiscal Option

<< back to top

Differences between the FFO concept and the application in the model
There are some differences between the FFO concept and the approach that has been employed in the spreadsheet model.

Possible Restrictions on Revenue Sharing: In certain situations, there may be a threshold at which restrictions on the amount of tax revenue that Canada is willing to forego in sharing its tax room with First Nation governments that enact tax laws applies. However, any such restrictions are not likely to reduce further revenue sharing to zero as revenues continue to increase beyond the threshold level where the restriction takes effect. This situation is not expected to be a factor for the majority of First Nations and as such not reflected in the model.

Property tax regime: The FFO contemplates a separate treatment of property tax revenue in order to take into consideration taxes collected from non-members. It is contemplated that those property tax revenues collected from non-members and not expended on local services would be subject to own source revenue consideration. This approach has been described as ‘netting out local services’.
As this approach has not yet been fully developed, the model does not ‘net out local services’ from property tax revenue.

Floor on transfer: The FFO contemplates a lower limit on the transfer that a First Nation would receive from other governments. This option contemplates a continuing role for federal funding to the provision of Agreed-Upon Programs and Services regardless of how much own source revenue that the First Nation is able to generate. The determination of transfer floor has not yet been articulated and will be the subject of negotiation with individual First Nations.

<< back to top


.